echelon
unleashing potential

Undertaking an integrated Board Review in the not-for-profit sector

A high performing housing association leverages additional talent from its Board Review

Business challenge

This not-for-profit board in the housing sector was an example of a highly regulated board where board members are drawn from the commercial, public and housing sectors. Like all housing boards there is also a solid representation of tenants in the form of Tenant Governors.

The strategic challenge was to conduct an efficient, 'paper lite', integrated review of whole Board performance and board sub committees, along with an individual review of selected board members. It needed to provide a helpful plan for succession. Additionally it was important to distil important learning that could be applied in other parts of the business, for example improved governance, particularly integrating the work of the board sub committees better along with adding value for future board member recruitment and development.

Echelon’s solution

Echelon designed a board competency framework against which both the board, board sub committees and individual board members could be reviewed and from which a board succession plan and a development plan for new tenant governors could be derived. It comprised a suite of:

Key Benefits

The resulting feedback informed a review of board sub committee performance, a board member development plan and in particular:

Click here to view full case study

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Echelon’s solution

Research

Technical board competencies were researched via a series of conversations with relevant people and a review of key documents and processes in particular their relationship to board sub committees. From the research were developed

1. Technical Board Competencies with Review Questions and cross matching to Board Sub Committees

2. Board Member Attributes with Self Review Questions

3. A suite of assurance questions for board members to select from and use.

Buy in

Board members are busy people and the need was for an efficient and 'paper lite' review, that could be rapidly assimilated. Each interview with selected board members needed to be efficiently conducted in 45 minutes so we developed a series of ‘one-pagers’ to illustrate feedback, for example:

Results

Twelve recommendations resulted in an: